You are here
|Title||Worthy of Another Look: Classics from the Past: The Book of Mormon, Historicity, and Faith|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||2009|
|Authors||Millet, Robert L.|
|Journal||Journal of the Book of Mormon and Other Restoration Scripture|
|Type of Article||Worthy of Another Look: Classics from the Past|
|Keywords||Anachronisms; Atonement; Expansionist View; Faith; Fall of Adam; Historicity; Joseph Smith; Resurrection|
A well-defined trend over the past two hundred years in secular biblical scholarship has been to sunder spiritual from historical, relegating events such as miracles and the resurrection to the category of “sacred stories.” This trend has also crept into some circles of LDS Book of Mormon scholarship, with adherents claiming an “expansionist” view of the Book of Mormon. They contend that the core of the text is historical but that so-called anachronisms in the text—references to the fall, atonement, resurrection, or new birth prior to the time of Christ—are due to Joseph Smith’s own interpolations. Because Book of Mormon writers and Joseph Smith himself clearly state that the text is entirely historical, this logically leaves expansionist advocates in the precarious position of claiming either that Joseph did not know the truth or that he lied. In contrast to this view, certain well-defined truths such as the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon, the reality of the First Vision, and the atonement and resurrection of Christ must stand as the foundation of the LDS faith.
Items in the BMC Archive are made publicly available for non-commercial, private use. Inclusion within the BMC Archive does not imply endorsement. Items do not represent the official views of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or of Book of Mormon Central.
Get the latest updates on Book of Mormon topics and research for free