You are here
|Title||Bamboozled by the CES Letter|
|Year of Publication||2015|
|Authors||Ash, Michael R.|
|Keywords||Apologetics; Book of Abraham; Book of Mormon; CES Letter; Early Church History; Eight Witnesses; First Vision; Kinderhook Plates; Polygamy; Priesthood; Prophets; Scripture Study; Temples; Testimony; Three Witnesses; Translation|
In April 2013 Jeremy T. Runnells published a PDF booklet entitled, “Letter to a CES Director.” This booklet, which is now typically referred to as the “CES Letter,” catalogs Runnells’ concerns and reason why he left the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons). Runnells has worked hard to make his booklet available to people everywhere (and in several languages) and has, unfortunately, been the agent for leading at least a few other believers out of Mormonism.
Sadly, most of those who have been bamboozled by the “CES Letter” are Latter-day Saints who were blind-sided by scholarly-sounding interpretations of challenging data. In my opinion, however, the “CES Letter” creates a caricature of Mormonism. The arguments are fundamentally flawed and do not accurately represent either Mormonism or the only logical interpretations of the data.
Unfortunately, the reason the “CES Letter” has enjoyed any success is that most Latter-day Saints have never been exposed to some of the more complex matters in early Mormon history. On average, the typical Latter-day Saint has never needed to think outside of the box on Mormon-related philosophical, historical, or scholarly issues.
“Bamboozled by the ‘CES Letter’” explains why these controversial issues need not kill a testimony. Interpretation matters. Many lay members, as well as educated Mormon scholars, are fully aware of every topic discussed in the “CES Letter” but continue strong in their faith because they recognize that there are logical interpretations which can be integrated with their belief in Mormonism. There are answers to the concerns raised by the “CES Letter,” and those answers can be supported by current scholarship as well as harmonized with the acceptance of Mormon truth claims.
Items in the BMC Archive are made publicly available for non-commercial, private use. Inclusion within the BMC Archive does not imply endorsement. Items do not represent the official views of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or of Book of Mormon Central.
- A Caricature of the Church
- Book of Mormon Concerns
- Book of Mormon Translation Concerns
- First Vision Concerns
- Book of Abraham Concerns
- Polygamy/Polyandry Concerns
- Prophets Concerns
- Kinderhook Plates and Translator/Seer Claims Concerns
- Testimony/Spiritual Witness Concerns
- Priesthood Restoration Concerns
- Witnesses Concerns
- Temples and Freemasonry Concerns
- Science Concerns
- Scriptures Concerns
- Other Concerns
- Conclusion (Bamboozled)